What it does
get_interpretation retrieves the most recent court decisions citing a given Slovak legislation provision — useful for seeing how a paragraf has actually been interpreted and applied by the courts.
Like every tool in this connector, it is read-only, covers Slovak law only, and its output is informational, not legal advice.
Inputs
| Name | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
regulation_number | string | Yes | The regulation, in canonical form (513/1991 Zb. / 311/2001 Z. z.) or bare (513/1991). |
section | string | No | The section (paragraf) to narrow the search to. |
paragraph | string | No | The paragraph (odsek) to narrow the search to. |
limit | int | No | Maximum number of citing decisions to return. Default 20. |
Returns
{
"regulation_number": "...",
"section": "...",
"paragraph": "...",
"citing_decisions": [
{
"document_content_id": "...",
"case_file_number": "...",
"release_date": "...",
"ecli": "...",
"courts": "...",
"areas": "..."
}
]
}
Example
Useful when the calling AI wants to answer a question like "how have courts applied § 63 of the Labour Code?" — it calls get_interpretation with regulation_number: "311/2001 Z. z." and section: "63", and gets back the most recent decisions citing that provision, each identified by its document_content_id, case_file_number, and ecli.
Notes
- Deterministic — debits your monthly corpus quota (see Usage limits).
- Does not return interpretive maxims (R-vety) in this version.
- Does not issue a provenance receipt, so its results cannot be passed to Verify answer's
receiptsinput.