What it does
search_holdings searches extracted holdings (právne vety) from Slovak court decisions. A holding is the generalized rule one decision applied — the transferable point of law, separated from the facts of that case. Each hit carries the holding as a paraphrase, the court's own passage it was extracted from, the source decision, and whether that decision sits in the current authority selection.
Like every tool in this connector, it is read-only, covers Slovak law only, and its output is informational, not legal advice.
Inputs
| Name | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
query | string | Yes | Natural-language description of the legal point. |
act_ref | string | No | Raw act reference as courts write it, e.g. 40/1964 Zb. — restricts hits to holdings applying that act. |
section | string | No | Bare paragraph number (e.g. 711). Applies only together with act_ref. |
limit | integer | No | Max hits (default 10). |
Returns
{
"results": [
{
"holding_text": "…paraphrase…",
"evidence": { "passage": "…the court's own wording…" },
"decision": {
"case_file_number": "…",
"court": "…",
"date": "…",
"url": "…or empty"
},
"in_authority_selection": true,
"admission_routes": ["…"]
}
]
}
Example
Asked whether a lease can be terminated without stating a reason, the calling AI runs search_holdings with query: "výpoveď nájmu bez uvedenia dôvodu" and act_ref: "40/1964 Zb.", then presents the holdings as rules the courts applied, quoting only evidence.passage as the court's words.
Notes
holding_textis a paraphrase — present it as one; onlyevidence.passagemay be quoted as the court's wording.decision.urlis empty about half the time; when it is, there is no public page to check the passage against, and the AI should say so.- An empty result is not proof that no case law exists — this index covers roughly 3 % of the corpus. Fall back to Search case law.
- Debits your monthly corpus quota (see Usage limits).